Oy. Skeptics.
When I first discovered the internet; many years ago, I went after skeptics. I had many a name for these debunkers. “Skeptoids,” “skeptic-bunkies,” and more. I had Yahoo groups (remember them?) devoted to bashing skeptics. Blogs that went after them with a vengeance. Argued with them, and, was the victim of their pathological insanity. I was called many names, insulted, lied about, and threatened. (With violence, with rape.)
I would count up the astounding number of links on the JREF forum relating to Bigfoot — so many dozens of links attacking the existence of Bigfoot! For a creature that skeptics insist isn’t real, there were sure (and no doubt still are; haven’t checked in a long time) a lot of threads devoted to Sasquatch.
Finally, I quite. Started using my own, real, legal name on-line. Partly because, in using my own name, that would hold me accountable to myself. Also, letting others know: this is me. Who I am. Really, truly me.
As it is now. Still me.
After awhile, things died down, and they’re still fairly quiet in that realm. But overall, lately, there has been an uptick in the skeptical world. Lots of links (see Anomalist, and Coast to Coast, etc. for links) to skeptics and anti-skeptics.
Things don’t change. They rest, they retreat for a moment, but after a while, they return. Skeptics are always with us. Still showing their ignorance, their smugness, their refusal to consider — seriously, and more importantly, honestly, — the subject they’re refuting.
Finally, I’d like to say, to para-phrase, “nobody believes in ghosts, until they’ve seen one.” Except, even in those cases, I know that’s not true. I’ve met a few who have seen ghosts, heard them, felt them, along with members of their family, and still refuse to acknowledge their existence. I’ve had people walk out of the room, rather than talk about the things they’ve seen, be it UFOs or strange creatures or ghosts. I’ve had people refuse to talk about the very things the rest of their loved ones have seen, as they themselves had. Their love for their family — siblings, spouses, etc. — isn’t enough to cancel out their fear, or refusal, to accept the anomaly. (And by the way, I have seen and heard ghosts, many a time.)
Why?
A question that intrigues me, but at the same time, I don’t pay much attention to anymore. I don’t argue. I don’t explain. Not now. Not anymore.
I will happily discuss my experiences. But explain? Justify? Apologize? Nope.
It is not my job to convince you. I don’t want to convince anyone. I simply tell my story. My truth. It is up to you — your choice — if you believe me, or care to honestly engage with me.
Otherwise, buzz off.
April 15, 2019 at 10:52 pm
Whelp… if it be blades, then let it be blades, by Crom! I’ll be edgin’ me literary saber!
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 16, 2019 at 10:29 pm
You make an important distinction: you don’t require others to believe. When proponents insist we must convert to their world view, it’s very annoying, even cranky. They argue the reason we don’t convert is because we must have a character defect, never because of any weakness or uncertainty in their evidence.
Certainty — I hate that stuff!
Likewise, I don’t go to skeptic blogs run by groups. Though I might agree with their positions generally, the certainty and arrogance and rampant “patting myself on the back while others are watching” is intolerable. Groupthink — the very thing that has destroyed politics and threatened to coat the US with the orange spray tan of fascism-lite.
I prefer blogs written by one person who knows their stuff, and will call out believers and skeptics alike for making stupid statements (Kevin Randle and Jason Colavito come to mind). Commenters from both sides can slug it out without getting banned (Lon Strickler has banned me on multiple blogs for performing basic fact-checking of stories, and Michael Heiser brags of blocking many Twitter accounts that push back against his alt-right paleoconservative grunting. He has been a big disappointment).
We see it in paranormal and political discussions: certainty characterised as a strength and doubt as a failure. I think it’s the opposite. That’s why I can’t join groups (except Little League baseball, of course).
LikeLiked by 1 person